Skip to content

Guide: Research & Discovery

Eight skills cover everything from “what has been done” to “where the gap is”, and every one of them insists on real, resolvable citations.

Multi-source search across OpenAlex, Crossref, Semantic Scholar, arXiv, PubMed, and Scite. Deduplicates by DOI then by title, ranks by relevance and citation count, and (in systematic mode) records a PRISMA flow with a reproducible search-provenance record.

Trigger it: “Do a systematic literature search on X”, “Find recent papers on Y”.

Not just finding papers, but converging on an argument. Three modes: Socratic (interactive), Full Research (deep, multi-round), and Flash (a quick scan).

Verifies a claim against the literature and returns a verdict (Supported, Contested, Partially Supported, Contradicted, or Unsupported) with the evidence behind it. It will return Unsupported rather than invent a source.

Trigger it:/researcher:fact-check <claim>”.

Tracks state-of-the-art results for a benchmark. Every number in the table is traced to the paper that reported it; leaderboard claims that cannot be traced are marked unverified.

Trigger it:/researcher:sota <benchmark>”.

Systematically identifies methodological, empirical, and theoretical gaps, and ranks them by impact potential, backing each with the searches that failed to find prior work.

Classifies how a paper is cited (supporting, contrasting, or mentioning) and audits your manuscript for sources you may have misrepresented.

The whole-manuscript integrity pass, added in 0.4.0. Runs a two-level check over every citation: an existence gate (does each reference resolve, and is it retracted) and a claim-faithfulness audit (does each cited passage actually support the claim). With the optional evidence kernel installed it verifies against multiple independent indexes with the four-state verdict; without it, it degrades to the single-index bib-validator.py check.

Trigger it: “Audit my citations”, “/researcher:verify-citations”.

Drives a manuscript end to end as staged, checkpointed work, added in 0.4.0: Plan, Retrieve, Synthesize, Draft, Review, Compile, and Format, pausing for the author after every stage and refusing to format until the evidence-lineage compile gate passes.

Trigger it:/researcher:research-pipeline <question>”.

The literature review recipe runs a systematic search and a fact-check end to end, and the examples/research-verification/ folder has the full worked output.